THE MUTABILITY OF LITERATURE.
economists. All possible encouragement, to tics, good or bad. But I fear all criticism do may, ers e, printers , and tably be overstocked of a lifetime merely to learn tion at t day reads scarcely anyt revieion tle better talogue.quot;
quot;My very good sir,quot; said ttle quarto, ya drearily in my face, quot;excuse my interrupting you, but I perceive you are rato prose. I e of an aut as I left tation, e temporary. t ed varlet, t knetle of Latin, and noto run try for deer-stealing. I to oblivion.quot;
quot;On trary,quot; said I, quot;it is oo t very man t terature of ion beyond term of Engliserature. t tability of language because ted ture. tic trees t imes see on tream, s, penetrating tions of t a, and , and pero perpetuity.
Sucs of time, retaining in modern use terature of ion to many an indifferent auty. But even o say, is gradually assuming tint of age, and ators, t up;
tle quarto began to il at lengt into a plet of laug ;Mig; cried ;mig terature of an age is to be perpetuated by a vagabond deer-stealer! by a man learning! by a poet! forsoot!quot; And of laughter.
I confess t I felt sometled at t of ermined, nevert to give up my point.
quot;Yes,quot; resumed I positively, quot;a poet; for of all ers cality. Ote from t es from t, and t and rayer of Nature, eresting. Prose ers are voluminous and uns expanded into tediousness. But rue poet every terse, touc.
ts in t language. rates t striking in nature and art. ur